|
The study was concluded to examine the influence of the structed nursing information on the recovery afther the operation in the case of general surgical patients. The objectives were 51 persons who were hospitalized in general surgical wards, during September 15-October 15, 1983, and consisted of the two groups,’ Experimental group: 23 persons who were informed about the structed nursing information before their operation. Control group: 28 persons who were not informed about the structed nursing information before their operation. The instruments used to evaluate the level of recovery of patien were Recovery Inventory and Mood and Feeling Inventory Written by wolfer and Davis, Nurse-Observer Rating of Aydellott. The results are as follows : 1. The structed nursing information didn’t influence the psychological stability significantly during the recovery after their surgical operation (t=1.86, df=44.94, p>.05). 2. The structed nursing information didn’t influence the physical recovery during the recovery significantly (t=0.72 , df=44.89, p>.05). 3. The structed nursing information influenced significantly the self-feeling strength and energy, (t=2.04, df=44.80. p<.05) but didn’t influence the Recovery Inventory score significantly (t=0.86, df=41.63, p>0.5). during the recovery. 4. The structed nursing information did influence the Mood and Feeling during the recovery significantly (t=4.49, df=44.03, p<.001). Especially, the items of relaxed, angry, depressed, calm were significant. The relaxed (t=3.67, df=42.75, p<.001) the angry (t=3.17, df=48.90 p<.01) the depressed (t=2.67, df=48.99, p<.01), the calm (t=2.39, df=48.66, p<.05). 5. The structed nursing information didn’t significantly influence the passage of flatus after the surgical operation (t=-0.20, df=45.27, p>.05), but there was a influence in shortening the time. 6. The structed nursing information didn’t influence shortening the first oral intaken after the surgical operation significantly. (t=-0.32, df=38.26, p>.05). 7. The structed nursing information didn’t significantly influence the ambulatory time during the recovery (t=-0.83, df=46.66, p>.05). 8. The structed nursing information didn’t influence the frequency of nausea during the recovery significantly (t=1.45, df=35.29, p>.05). 9. The structed nursing information influenced significantly the frequency of using analgesics (t=-2.89, df=47.39, p<.01). Especially, it influenced significantly for the first day after the operation (t=-3.77, df=48.55, p<.001). 10. The structed nursing information didn’t influence the stability of vital sing during the recovery significantly. (pules rate: t=-.0.38, df=47.67, p>.05, systolic blood pressure; t=-0.28, df=48.49, p>.05, diastolic blood procedure; t=-0.01, df=45.95, p>.05). 11. Higher, educated group was significantly stable in the Mood and Feeling(F=4.05, df=50, p<.05). 12. People in religion are more tolerable to the pain (t=11.44, df=50, p<.01). In conclusion, the structed nursing information should be advised to the patients prior to the procedure because the structed nursing information influence the psychological stability of the patients. Further, for the prompt recovery in psychological and physical of the patients, more effective structed nursing information should be researched, as nursing intervention.
|